Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities.
For there is no authority except from God,
and those which exist are established by God.
Romans 13 and the Persecution-Seeking Christian
Whenever we ponder Christianity and government, you can almost wager some well-meaning believer will argue that we can’t expect rulers to be just because Paul actually had the Roman Emperor Nero Claudius Caesar in mind when he penned Romans 13.
Like many of his predecessors in the Julio-Claudian dynasty, Nero was a bit of a beast. He had his own mother killed. The Roman historian Tacitus had this to report about him:
Therefore, to stop the rumor [that he had set Rome on fire], he [Emperor Nero] falsely charged with guilt.. the persons commonly called Christians.. In their very deaths they were made the subjects of sport: for they were covered with the hides of wild beasts, and worried to death by dogs, or nailed to crosses, or set fire to, and when the day waned, burned to serve for the evening lights…[1]
Most scholars believe Paul composed his epistle to the Romans between 55 and 57 AD, or roughly about the time Nero came to the throne at the age of sixteen. Given the brutal, bloody and conniving history of Nero’s family, would it have been reasonable to believe that Paul, the ambassador-apostle of the faith, under divine inspiration, would look at the Roman Caesars and conclude, “now that, boys and girls, is some mighty fine and virtuous leadership?”
The scene almost seems comic. We can’t imagine Paul, over a meal, leaning back and saying something like, “Nero’s a pretty good guy. He only burns a few believers alive every night.”
But, wait, you argue: why would we expect any ruler, any government to be fair or just? Shouldn’t we expect persecution as Christians?
To answer that question, we must remember the consequences of a simple truth, confirmed over and over in scripture: Our God is a God of absolute justice. We don’t worship a philandering Zeus or a remorseless Thor. The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is the author of the just scale and the bribe-hating judge.
Both Paul and Peter followed the same exact pattern in describing the obligations of a magistrate. A ruler is a joy to the righteous and “an avenger who brings wrath” against the wicked:
“For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; 4 for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil.” (Romans 13:3-4)
“Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right.” (1 Peter 2:13-14)
Two different apostles with precisely the same assurance: do the right thing and rulers will praise you. Do evil and rulers will punish you. The commandment to obey authority comes with an assurance: rulers have an obligation, from God, to be just. That’s why every magistrate, Christian or not, are called “ministers of God.”
Sometimes when I hear Christians yearning for persecution, or justifying bad magistrates, I almost think they see Paul’s actual words, but read them as follows: “Obey rulers at all times because they can be nasty buggers.” Not at all, both Peter and Paul were preaching to both the prince and his people. If you want to know why so many dictators and tyrants hate the Bible, it’s because they know God’s Word puts them on warning: be fair, be just, or the Most High God is coming after you.
So in view of the many times Paul and Peter were unjustly beaten and imprisoned, and in view of the horrible brutality of Roman emperors, what are we to conclude? Were Paul and Peter just kidding about the obligations of rulers? Far from it: Let God’s Word be true and every man a liar. Paul and Peter were speaking for God. They were putting every magistrate in the Roman empire on warning: Unjust rulers will face His wrath, and sometimes it may even be delivered by His Servants.
Over and over in the Bible, we see this pattern: God allowed Moses to beat Pharaoh back with plagues. The Hebrew midwives lied to the king and disobeyed him when they were commanded to kill Hebrew newborns. In a kind of ancient tax revolt, Ehud stuck a knife in the belly of an evil king and called it a message from God. The wise men refused to tell Herod where the Christ Child was born. Peter, when ordered not to preach the Gospel, disobeyed the religious authorities and concluded it was better to obey God than man. When Paul’s Roman citizenship was abused, he refused to be secreted away, but demanded his jailers own up to their wrong doing.
We obey rulers, in other words, when they are doing what God wants them to do, and we disobey them, rebuke them, recall them, vote against them, and–depending on circumstances–confront them with arms, when they are in violation of God’s will.
Persecution may come from a mother-killing emperor, but it will never be “just” or it isn’t persecution in the first place. In other words, if you want to be persecuted for Christ’s sake — oppose an evil magistrate. That will do the trick.
Not only did the Apostle Paul not have Caesar in mind, there’s absolutely nothing in Romans 13 describing a secular civil government.* Rather, everything therein depicts a biblical civil government and, as such, is our mandate for biblical dominion over government and society.
The one word “continually” or “devoted” (depending upon your Bible version) in Verse 6 (amplifying Verses 3 & 4) alone proves the point. Unless someone’s willing to declare the Roman Empire (one of the most notorious for murdering Christians) was a government that continually (Verse 6) blessed Christians and terrorized/punished the wicked (Verses 3 & 4), they best rethink their theology regarding this extremely important passage of Scripture.
And that’s only one of ten contextual reasons proving the same thing.
For more, see free online book “The Romans 13 Template for Biblical Dominion: Ten Reasons Why Romans 13 is Not About Secular Government” at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/Romans13/Romans13-contents.html
*What makes a government secular is its rejection of Yahweh, God of the Bible, as its Sovereign and thus His moral law as supreme. Idolatry is not so much about statues as it is statutes, such as what one consider the supreme law of the land. Do we really think this is what Paul was promoting in Romans 13 or anywhere else, especially in light of Acts 4, 5, and 17:6-7?
Deakonis — ministers of God. I’ve heard folks debate whether pagans and non-believers can serve in that role and still have that standard, but both Peter and Paul seem to indicate the requirement to be just falls equally on both types of rulers.
Hi James! Thanks for responding.
However, I’m not sure I’m understanding your point.
By the way, if you would like a complimentary copy of the book I cited above, I’ll be pleased to send you a copy.
Thanks, Ted. I’d love to see it. I just meant that the standard for rulers, “deakonis” (ministers of God) seems to be the same no matter if they are believers are not. Paul and Peter were writing the Godly standard, irrespective of whatever poor excuse for a ruler was on the throne at the time.
Great! Is the following the correct address to send it to?
James Riley
12261 Oak Glen Rd
Yucaipa, CA 92399-9754
That’s it.
Lord willing, I’ll have a copy to you no later than in Saturday’s mail.
Blessings!